I just found an article on NBA.com which addresses one of the things that has me feeling a lot better about Miami's chances and the work that Spoelstra has put in this season:
http://www.nba.com/2010/news/features/john_schuhmann/04/08/numbers.game/index.html
It shows that Miami is a top 5 defensive team along with Orlando, Charlotte, Milwaukee and Boston. The article shows statistics that prove that defensive oriented teams tend to do better than offensive oriented teams. While I agree that these numbers prove that Milwaukee, Charlotte and Miami are not flukes and will be ready to play D when it matters most, I was more pleased when I took a closer look at our unbalanced team (defined as a team that has a gap bigger than 10 spots between their offensive and defensive efficiency rankings).
Miami is tied for 3rd in the league in defensive efficiency, but is just 19th on the offensive side. The cool thing is that when you look at the best teams in the NBA, they have large numbers when you subtract their defensive efficiency rating from their offensive efficiency rating:
Orlando: 9.0
Cleveland: 8.1
LA Lakers: 5.3
Phoenix: 5.3
San Antonio: 5.2
Utah: 5.0
Boston: 4.7
Atlanta: 4.5
Denver: 4.4
Ok. City: 4.3
Portland: 4.3
Miami: 3.6
Dallas: 3.4
The middle of the pack does not:
Charlotte: 1.4
Milwaukee: 1.2
Houston: -0.9
Toronto: -1.7
Memphis: -2.3
Chicago: -2.4
New Orl.: -2.6
I believe Coach Spoelstra spent most of the season neglecting the offensive side of the ball because he was busy getting the guys to buy into winning with defense. Recently there have been signs of life on the offensive end, with the reinsertion of Carlos Arroyo into the lineup, increased opportunities for Quentin (he's shooting more 3's and posting up as well) and feeding the big man - Jermaine O'Neal. We are even seeing more offense from Haslem, Wright, Chalmers and Joel Anthony. This trend will have to continue for Miami to advance to the second round of the playoffs.
As far as doing the impossible, I am not holding my breath, but I think they have more in common with the 2005-06 NBA champs than we may realize. Let me break it down position by position, using rounded up per 36 season averages:
'06 Dwyane Wade
25 pts, 5 rebs, 6 asts, 2 stls
vs.
'10 Dwyane Wade
26 pts, 5 rebs, 7 asts, 2 stls
Even
'06 Shaquille O'Neal
24 pts, 11 rebs, 2 blks
vs.
'10 Jermaine O'Neal
17 pts, 9 rebs, 2 blks
Edge 2006
'06 Antoine Walker
16 pts, 7 rebs, 3 asts, 2 3pts
vs.
'10 Michael Beasley
18 pts, 8 rebs, 2 asts, 0 3pts
Even
'06 Alonzo Mourning
14 pts, 10 rebs, 5 blks
vs.
'10 Joel Anthony
6 pts, 7 rebs, 3 blks
Edge 2006
'06 Jason Williams
14 pts, 6 asts, 1 stl, 2 3pts
vs.
'10 Carlos Arroyo
10 pts, 5 asts, 1 stl, 0 3pts
Edge 2006
'06 Udonis Haslem
11 pts, 9 rebs, 1 stl
vs.
'10 Udonis Haslem
13 pts, 10 rebs, 1 stl
Edge 2010
'06 James Posey
9 pts, 6 rebs, 2 asts, 1 stl, 2 3pts
vs.
'10 Quentin Richardson & Dorell Wright combo
12 pts, 6 rebs, 2 asts, 1 stl, 2 3pts
Edge 2010
'06 Gary Payton
10 pts, 4 rebs, 4 asts, 1 stl, 1 3pt
vs.
'10 Mario Chalmers
10 pts, 3 rebs, 5 asts, 2 stls, 2 3pt
Even
'06 Jason Kapono
11 pts, 4 rebs, 2 asts, 1 3pt
vs.
'10 James Jones
10 pts, 3 rebs, 1 asts, 1 stl, 3 3pt
Even
Obviously, the 2005-06 was a better team. Their production from the Center position allowed them to play inside outside and created a lot of open 3 pointers for their shooters. This team does not create as many open looks from beyond the arc, but does not hesitate to shoot them when they are open. In 2006, Antoine Walker played the role of the maddeningly inconsistent forward chucker and this year Michael Beasley has played that role. Many Miami fans turned on Antoine in 2006, even booing him at times, but Pat Riley found a way to get great production out of him. If Spoelstra finds a way to get great production from Beasley, who has lost the faith of many Heat faithful, I wonder how far Wade can carry this group of guys.